- Agent:“Hi — quick check on your install order. The site-survey form didn't come through. Can I help get it across?”
- Quote:“I tried uploading floor plans from my phone last week. Got an error and gave up.”
- Agent:“That caught a few customers on the old portal. I can text you a fresh secure-upload link and book a 10-min walk-through — Wed 10am or Thu 2pm?”
Deflect tier-1. Resolve incidents faster. A workforce that compounds.
Operators running on Karmaflow handle tier-1 support, NOC alert triage, field-dispatch coordination, and account servicing as one continuous system. Agents that reason across OSS, BSS, ticketing, network telemetry, and the subscriber graph — turning every ticket into context the next one inherits, with a signed audit trail at every step.
Built for 24/7 operations. Tested in production. Governed end-to-end.
The 3 a.m. tickets nobody answered until Monday.
Inbound calls, chats, NOC alerts, and field-dispatch updates accumulate continuously across every region you serve. By Monday morning your queue is hundreds deep — including the outage callers and field-rebook requests that needed an answer by Friday. The cost is not just operational. It is the customer who switched providers, the SLA that was breached, and the subscriber who tried once and gave up.
Operators running on Karmaflow hold every channel continuously. Tier-1 questions resolved at the moment they're asked. NOC alerts correlated and triaged in real time. Escalations routed to the right human with full context — not at 9 a.m. Monday, but the moment they arrive. Every action, audit-trail signed.
Three voices, one operating layer
“We've added thirty tier-1 agents in eighteen months. First-call resolution is still 58%. Repeat truck rolls keep eating any gain. Something in the operating model is broken.”
Their team kept shipping — cloud AI, on-prem LLMs, custom integrations. The agents ran everything around it.
UCLab is an Ottawa applied AI studio building software, automation, and private LLM systems for businesses that need to move fast and keep their data close. Their team wanted to spend their days designing systems — not triaging inbound, qualifying leads, or rewriting the same proposal for the fifth time. Karmaflow gave them a working layer underneath the studio: a customer service agent across web, voice, SMS, and email, and operational agents embedded with every person inside the firm.
The result is a studio that runs leaner than it should be able to. Inbound gets answered, qualified, and converted at a rate the team couldn’t sustain manually — and the work of putting a project on paper, from research to proposal to contract, dropped from a week to about ten minutes.
- 83%
- Support queries automated at first touch
- 2×
- Lead-to-customer conversion
- ~250×
- Faster research, proposal & contract
We’ve been doing applied AI since long before it was a buzzword. Karmaflow is the layer that lets us keep doing the interesting work — not the work around the work.The team, UCLab.ai
PDF · 4 PAGES · NO FORMS BEFORE READING

Every new hire, fully ramped on day one.
Your operating runbooks, change-management policies, CPNI handling rules, and tier-1 scripts live across Confluence, ServiceNow, the OSS/BSS, training PDFs, change-advisory emails, and the heads of three senior engineers who've been there since the last core migration. New hires take ninety days to ramp. Tickets escalate because they can't find the right runbook fast enough.
The agent answers in seconds, with citations to the actual runbook, the actual policy, the actual past ticket where someone resolved this before. It works for customers asking servicing questions. It works for your tier-1 team. It works for NOC engineers preparing a change window or a fraud analyst working a suspected port-out alert.
Residential gigabit intermittent-drop runbook:
1. Pull last 24h of session logs from BNG · check PPPoE re-auth frequency
2. Query CPE telemetry: signal-to-noise margin and uncorrected codeword errors
3. Cross-reference any active OLT alarms on the upstream feeder
4. If SNR < 6 dB or feeder alarm active: queue field dispatch with diagnostic packet
5. If clean signal + repeat history: schedule firmware push and follow-up call
Your CRM tracks stages. We track meaning.
Your CRM tracks account stages. Your OSS tracks circuits. Your ticketing system tracks tickets. Your self-care portal tracks logins. None of them talk to each other in a way that says this subscriber is about to switch — here's why, here's what to do, here's the runbook.
Karmaflow does. The platform reasons across all of those systems at once. It surfaces the patterns that no single tool was ever asked to find — and it does so before the renewal review, not after.
- ATTRITION SIGNALEnterprise 4471Fibre · multi-site · primary circuit$1.2M ARR · renewal overdue 22 days
- Primary account exec lefttwo weeks ago — book unassigned
- Repeat truck rolls risingover 14 days · field visits up 38%
- RFP draftedin competitor portal — not yet submitted
Reassignment to senior account exec · account brief prepared · outreach drafted for review - ATTRITION SIGNALMSP Client 2218Managed IT · 240 seats · co-managed$340K ARR · renewal in 19 days
- Ticket volume -40%across last quarter — endpoint count down twice in a row
- Escalations +22%same window — clustered around endpoint security
- Pattern flaggedgraph match with two prior churn precursors
Account health check · service-delivery follow-up flagged · QBR brief queued - PAYMENT SIGNALBusiness Line 9027SIP trunks · premium tier$18K MRR · auto-pay failing
- Two failed paymentsconsecutive · external card declined
- 60-day silenceno portal logins · no inbound contact
- Compounding riskno disputes yet — but late-fee accrual starting
Payment outreach sequence live · billing-method update · account manager briefed
Your CRM tracks stages. We surface what your stack can't see.
Your CRM tells you what stage an account is in. We tell you what's actually moving it — and what isn't.
An account agent reasons across quote pipeline, OSS circuit data, support tickets, and customer conversation in one pass. The signals that no single tool was asked to find — surfaced before the renewal review, not after.
- UnassignedEnterprise 8814portal: "what bandwidth tiers are available at our new site?"
- UnassignedMSP Client 2218chat: asked about endpoint-security add-on (3rd time this month)
- UnassignedEnterprise 4471portal: viewed SD-WAN upgrade page x4 last 7 days
- UnassignedSMB 0921support call: mentioned a circuit renewing at another carrier
- Quote #5482 · $74K fibre installBuyer in renewal window — install survey pending 11 days, follow-up queued
- Circuit Renewal · $112KCustomer travelling — renewal window 4 days, outreach drafted
- SD-WAN Order #3318 · $58KSite survey scheduled — order packet auto-sent Friday
- SIP Renewal · $9.6K MRRAccount contact out of office — re-engagement drafted for next Wed
Your engagement tool sends. We answer.
Marketing automation is excellent at pushing messages. Engagement tools are excellent at tracking opens and clicks. Neither of them is built to have a regulated, runbook-backed conversation.
Karmaflow holds the conversation that follows. A stalled install order gets a thoughtful reply — and the agent answers the survey question, books the walk-through, or escalates to a human only when judgement is required. A renewal nudge gets a question back about upgrade options — and the agent qualifies with full context from the subscriber graph, with runbook citations attached.
Reads from and writes to Salesforce, ServiceNow, Zendesk, Genesys, Five9, NetCracker, Amdocs, and the long tail via .
- Agent:“Hi — your fibre circuit auto-renews in 11 days. Wanted to flag your options before the window closes.”
- Enterprise:“Honestly weighing whether to move spend to another carrier. What does an SD-WAN upgrade look like?”
- Agent:“Based on your usage and site count, I've drafted a side-by-side of your current renewal vs. an SD-WAN bundle, and looped your account exec in for Friday.”
- Agent:“Hi — saw your message about cancelling service. Mind if I ask what changed?”
- Residential:“I reported intermittent drops three weeks ago. Never heard back. Honestly just gave up.”
Five teammates. One operating layer.
Every agent runs its own workflow on the same shared model. The Tier-1 Resolver knows what the NOC Co-Pilot saw last week. The Renewal & Upsell agent inherits every signal the Service Desk Resolver surfaced over the past six months — and every runbook citation served along the way.
- 01
Tier-1 Resolver
- MISSION
- Inbound and outbound triage for support tickets across chat, voice, SMS, and email. Walks subscribers through CPE diagnostics, books field appointments, and writes structured notes back to the ticketing system with confidence scores and missing-info flags.
- CHANNELS
- Web chat · Voice · SMS · Email
- KPIS
- Tier-1 deflection rate · First-response time · Truck-roll avoidance
- 02
NOC Co-Pilot
- MISSION
- Correlates and deduplicates network-alert noise, runs runbooks against active incidents, and prepares pre-bridge briefings the on-call engineer would otherwise spend an hour assembling — with reasoning trace attached.
- CHANNELS
- Webhook · Email · Slack · Teams
- KPIS
- Mean time to identify · Alert-to-action time · Engineer time-to-prep
- 03
Service Desk Resolver
- MISSION
- Handles phone, chat, and email IT service requests. Password resets, access workflows, common L1 incidents, and account servicing — cited to runbooks and policy, with identity-locked steps for sensitive actions.
- CHANNELS
- Web chat · Email · Voice · ITSM portal
- KPIS
- First-contact resolution · Containment rate · CSAT · Escalation quality
- 04
Renewal & Upsell
- MISSION
- Detects upgrade intent, runs contract-renewal pre-engagement for fibre, SD-WAN, SIP, and managed-service terms, surfaces opportunities 60–90 days ahead of contract expiry with usage and entitlement framing.
- CHANNELS
- Email · Portal · Voice · SMS
- KPIS
- Renewal retention rate · Upgrade qualified · Days-to-first-renewal-touch
- 05
Provisioning Orchestrator
- MISSION
- Walks new customers through site survey, install scheduling, and activation milestones. Escalates address exceptions. Surfaces fastest-path-to-live before silent-cancellation risk forms.
- CHANNELS
- Email · Portal · SMS
- KPIS
- Time-to-first-live · Activation rate · 90-day subscriber retention
- +
Add another teammate
- MISSION
- Field-Dispatch Coordinator? Outage Comms? Fraud Port-Out Triage? Collections Hardship? Configure on the platform — the same shared graph, the same audit discipline, the same risk-tier guardrails.
- CHANNELS
- Voice · SMS · Email · Chat · API · Human Interface
- KPIS
- Your KPIs · Your governance · Your timeline
The cancellation that wasn't.
A 14-year subscriber opens self-care at 11:47 p.m. on a Thursday: “I've been with you 14 years. I'm seriously thinking of moving everything to another carrier.”
What happens next is not a script.
- Primary subscriber · 11:47 p.m. ThuI've been with you 14 years. I'm seriously thinking of moving everything to another carrier.
- Karmaflow agent · 11:47 p.m.I hear you, and I appreciate you saying so directly. Before I do anything, I see an intermittent-drop ticket you filed three weeks ago that never got back to you — that should not have happened. I'm escalating it to tier-2 on-call right now and would like to book a 15-minute call with a senior account manager tomorrow morning. Does 9:30 a.m. work?
- Primary subscriber · 11:48 p.m.Honestly that's the first useful response I've had in weeks. Yes, 9:30 works.
- Pulled subscriber graph14-year relationship · 3 services on account · primary account exec reassigned 6 weeks ago.
- Checked ticket historyOne open intermittent-drop ticket from 21 days ago · field visit never scheduled · SLA clock expired.
- Identified the holderPrimary, not secondary. Highest MRR on the account before recent activity drop.
- Chose a pathAcknowledge directly · surface open ticket · escalate to tier-2 · book senior account-manager call · log audit entry.
- ActedResponded in subscriber’s tone · filed escalation in ticket ledger · booked the call · briefed account manager with full context · audit-trail signed.
The pattern no one saw until now.
A weekly portfolio briefing arrives in a senior account manager's inbox on Monday morning. It is not a dashboard. It is a synthesis.
No single conversation revealed it. The graph did. This is what compounding intelligence looks like in practice.
- Q2 · APR 14Enterprise 4471 — ticket #4082Intermittent-drop ticket · field visit scheduled late. Resolved individually.
- Q2 · MAY 03Enterprise 4471 — CSAT droppedCSAT -2 the week after the ticket closed. No one connected it.
- Q3 · AUG 07SMB 0921 — ticket #4731Same drop signature, different site. Resolved individually.
- Q3 · AUG 22SMB 0921 — CSAT droppedTwo weeks after the ticket. No one connected it.
- Q4 · OCT 30Residential 2218 — ticket #5219Same drop signature, third location. Tier-2 treated as one-off.
- Q4 · NOV 11Residential 2218 — CSAT droppedSame week after. Underlying feeder pattern still invisible to engineering.
- Three subscribers have logged tickets matching the same drop signature across the last two quarters.Cross-referenced 3 tickets · feeder + symptom + window match
- Each ticket was resolved individually. No engineer connected them.Ticket ledger walk · 6-month window
- CSAT dropped at each subscriber in the week following each ticket.CSAT pulse joined to ticket close events
- Two of the three are inside their renewal review window.Renewal calendar · 90-day lookahead
- Recommended action: surface the feeder pattern to network engineering as a portfolio signal, not three separate cases. Three pre-renewal conversations have been drafted for account-manager approval.Action queue · awaiting human approval
The morning briefing that wrote itself overnight.
While your team sleeps, the platform works. Not by sending more emails — by thinking.
Not a dashboard. A briefing. With the gaps already flagged, the actions already proposed, and the workday already in motion before anyone arrives.
- Tier-1 tickets resolved47
- NOC alerts triaged23
- Field appointments booked14
- Renewal touches11
- Average first response6 sec
- 1 major incident in progress · needs change-advisory approval
- 1 billing dispute > $40K · second-line review required
- 1 churn signal · strategic enterprise account · account-manager brief queued
- →Eight renewal re-engagement sequences drafted
- →Three upgrade plays queued for account-exec review
- →One feeder-pattern synthesis ready for the network engineering team
- →Tier-2 escalation filed with full reasoning trace for on-call
Everyone's chief of staff. Nobody's replacement.
The same platform serves the account exec preparing for a renewal review, the tier-1 rep looking up a runbook, the field-ops lead synthesising feeder patterns, the NOC lead walking into a major-incident bridge, the COO asking which accounts she should personally call this week.
Five roles. Five different needs. One operating layer that knows the operation well enough to serve all of them — and one audit ledger that records every action.
- Account Exec“Walks into a renewal review with the full subscriber graph attached.”
- NOC Lead“Pre-bridge briefing assembled in seconds, not an hour.”
- Tier-1“Runbook citation surfaced before the customer sees a wait state.”
- Field Ops“Pattern detection synthesises a feeder signal no single ticket revealed.”
- COO / Exec“Knows which strategic accounts to personally call this week — and why.”
And beneath every workflow you've just seen, a graph that learns.
Every conversation, every ticket, every renewal, every telemetry signal feeds into a single living layer — a graph of accounts, subscribers, sites, circuits, devices, behaviours, and outcomes that grows richer with every interaction.
But the graph is not the product. The reasoning is. Agents synthesise across the graph the way your best account exec would — reading the tone of a closed ticket, recognising the silence after a pricing question, connecting a public role-change signal to a private portal conversation. They produce briefings, recommendations, and proactive actions that no single tool in your stack could have surfaced — every one with a citation chain and an audit-ledger entry.
A new agent launched on day one starts with the full operational memory of every agent that came before it. There is no cold start. There is no re-training.
Tuesday, 6:14 a.m.
Marcus Reed — primary contact at Enterprise 4471 ($1.2M ARR, 14-year relationship) — is in active carrier evaluation. Your retention score is green. Your account exec is unaware. Annual renewal review is 22 days overdue.
- 01TICKET TONE · NOT TICKET STATUS
Marcus opened ticket #4821 twenty-one days ago over intermittent drops on the primary fibre circuit. Tier-1 closed it with “reseat resolved.” Marcus's tone shifted between his first and second portal message — from cooperative to clipped. He used the phrase “this has been going on for months.” The closure was procedural; the frustration was unresolved.
- 02THE SILENCE AFTER A PRICING QUESTION
Four weeks ago, Marcus asked your account exec about preferred pricing after consolidating sites. The AE replied with the standard rate card. Marcus did not reply. The same question pattern preceded upgrade at three other accounts. The same post-rate-card silence preceded churn at two recent ones.
- 03A PUBLIC ROLE-CHANGE MENTION
Marcus posted a job change to LinkedIn last week — new role, different region. Decision-maker changes drive 38% of carrier-evaluation decisions. The research agent surfaced this from a scheduled scan of consented public sources tied to your account list.
- 04A PORTAL QUESTION ABOUT EARLY TERMINATION
In the secure portal channel six days ago, Marcus asked: “If I were to move primary transport to another carrier, what's the early-termination process?” The data was accessed through the governed integration with full permission scoping, field-level access scope, and audit trail.
Frustration that your tier-1 team marked resolved. A pricing inquiry that went without meaningful follow-up. A public role-change signal. A portal question about early termination. Each signal alone is ambiguous. Together they form a coherent carrier-evaluation pattern — one your existing stack was not built to detect.
- →Brief Priya Shah (senior AE) immediately. Talking points and personal-outreach call sheet drafted.
- →Re-open ticket #4821 with tier-2 attention; offer Marcus direct access to the engineer who can root-cause the drops.
- →AE follow-up to the pricing question, reframed around the multi-site consolidation use case Marcus was actually asking about — with entitlement summary attached.
- →Renewal-review conversation pulled forward by 30 days; usage and entitlement pre-read prepared.
- Enterprise 4471 · $1.2M ARR · renewal 22d overdue
- Enterprise 8814
- MSP Client 2218
- SMB 0921
- Carrier 0044
- + 24,832 more
- Marcus Reed · primary contact
- Priya Shah · senior AE
- J. Walters · NOC lead
- A. Diaz · tier-1 lead
- + 38,196 more
- Ticket #4821 · intermittent drops
- AE reply · pricing · 4w
- Portal msg · ETF · 6d
- Ticket #4082
- Ticket #5219
- + 71,861 more
- Multi-site bandwidth inquiry · 4w
- Bandwidth utilisation +22%
- Portal login · new admin
- Upgrade-page pageviews ×4
- + 19,104 more
- Reed · LinkedIn job change · 7d
- CPNI handling brief
- NPS · +4 pts
- Retained · Q3
- + 4,212 more
The graph is the substrate. The reasoning is the workforce. The compounding is yours.
From customer-facing work to the whole operation.
The same Living Intelligence Layer extends beyond tier-1 and NOC into incident communications, internal help desk, and channel operations — reinforcing that this is a workforce for the whole operation, not a point tool.
Outage Comms & Status Page
Agents correlate inbound calls and alerts against active incidents, dedupe duplicate reports, draft outage messaging with affected-area and ETA framing, update the status page, and notify subscribers — before a human triages a single ticket.
Network & Conduct Synthesis
Pattern detection across tickets, NOC alerts, field-tech call notes, and complaint logs. Surfaces engineering-ready summaries that no individual signal could have produced — under a reviewable reasoning trace.
Internal IT & Service Desk
The same Service Desk Resolver pattern, applied internally. SSO resets, VPN access, ITSM portal questions — answered with the same governance, identity-lock, and citation discipline.
Channel Partner Operations
Independent VARs, MSPs, and channel partners get self-serve Q&A, order status, and provisioning support — without consuming your channel team's time on the same questions every week.
Compliance is not a feature. It is the operating temperature of the platform.
Data Protection
Encryption in transit and at rest. Tenant isolation. Field-level access scopes for CPNI, PII, and customer proprietary network information. Redaction by policy. Data residency options for EU, UK, US, and Canadian deployments. CPNI-aligned data handling.
Identity Lock
Every action an agent takes is bound to a scoped, identity-locked permission. Tier 1 actions auto-execute under guardrails. Tier 2 actions soft-approve. Tier 3 actions — port-outs, plan changes, SIM swaps, network changes with customer impact — require hard human approval with verified identity and quorum.
Unified Action Ledger
Every read, every write, every action, every escalation is logged in the Unified Action Ledger — reconstructible, exportable, and review-ready for change-advisory, internal audit, second-line, and customer audit requests.
Compliance is not a feature. It is the operating temperature of the platform.
How Karmaflow compares to the telco & IT workflow tools you already pay for.
ServiceNow, Amdocs, NetCracker, Genesys, and Zendesk automate telco and IT workflows. Karmaflow runs autonomous reasoning across them. The two layers are designed to coexist — your existing stack stays, the reasoning layer sits above it with a signed audit trail.
| Capability | Karmaflow | ServiceNow | Amdocs | NetCracker | Genesys | Zendesk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning across OSS, BSS, ticketing, telemetry, and subscriber graphA single agent reasons over circuit context, ticket history, and runbook policy before acting. | Native capability | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Partial or workflow-style coverage |
| Cross-ticket memory across subscribers and quartersPattern recognition that compounds across every support or NOC contact, not per-session. | Native capability | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Not a marketed capability | Not a marketed capability | Not a marketed capability | Not a marketed capability |
| Voice, chat, SMS, email as one identitySame agent, same memory, same audit trail across every channel — with required-runbook adherence. | Native capability | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Not a marketed capability | Not a marketed capability | Native capability | Partial or workflow-style coverage |
| Autonomous action with risk-tier guardrailsLow-risk auto-execute, medium-risk soft-approve, high-risk hard-stop until human confirms identity. | Native capability | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Not a marketed capability | Partial or workflow-style coverage |
| Operates legacy OSS/BSS and admin tools without good APIsHuman Interface lets agents drive UI like a human team would — for the long tail of internal systems. | Native capability | Not a marketed capability | Not a marketed capability | Not a marketed capability | Not a marketed capability | Not a marketed capability |
| Identity-locked sensitive actions with step-up verificationPlan changes, port-outs, SIM swaps, and CPNI access gated behind verified customer identity and quorum approval. | Native capability | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Partial or workflow-style coverage |
| Unified Action Ledger — signed audit trail per decisionOne reviewable record per action — what, why, what data, what permission, what runbook, what outcome. | Native capability | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Partial or workflow-style coverage | Partial or workflow-style coverage |
| Stack-neutral — reads from and writes to your existing systemsOSS/BSS, ServiceNow, Amdocs, NetCracker, Genesys, Zendesk, Salesforce — partner, not replacement. | Native capability | Not a marketed capability | Not a marketed capability | Not a marketed capability | Not a marketed capability | Not a marketed capability |
Comparison reflects publicly available product documentation and marketed capabilities as of 2026. The five vendor platforms remain valuable workflow tools — Karmaflow operates above them, reading from and writing to the systems your operation already uses.
Karmaflow is an autonomous AI workforce that operates tier-1 support, NOC alert triage, field-dispatch coordination, account servicing, and outage communications as one continuous system. Operators use the platform to deploy agents that reason across OSS, BSS, ticketing, network telemetry, and the subscriber graph — turning every ticket into compounding intelligence with a signed audit trail.
The platform handles the high-volume reasoning-based work; humans focus where their judgement compounds most — major incidents, account advisory, and change-advisory review.
Those tools automate workflows. Karmaflow runs autonomous reasoning across them. A Zendesk bot answers from a knowledge base; a Karmaflow agent reasons across the subscriber graph, the ticket history, the network telemetry signal, and the runbook citations to decide what to actually do — and then does it, with identity-locked guardrails for sensitive actions.
Your existing stack is a partner, not a competitor. The platform reads from and writes to it through APIs, MCPs, and — for legacy OSS/BSS and admin tools without good APIs — through , which operates software the way a human team would.
Phase one — first agents live, handling real channels — typically under a week.
Phase two — deeper agents with cross-system integrations and account-graph awareness — typically 2 to 4 weeks.
Selective phase three deployments — managed integrations into custom or legacy systems — run 4 to 12 weeks. We commit to honest ranges, not breathless claims.
Two starting agents: a customer-facing teammate (Tier-1 Resolver or NOC Co-Pilot, depending on where the operational pain is loudest) and a staff-facing knowledge teammate that grounds answers in runbooks, change-management policy, and CPNI handling.
This pair generates immediate operational lift while the subscriber graph begins to populate. Subsequent agents inherit that context and the same audit discipline.
Enterprise security controls with tenant isolation, field-level access scopes for CPNI, PII, and customer proprietary network information, and redaction in transit and at rest. CPNI-aligned, GDPR and CCPA-compliant data handling. Configurable data residency for EU, UK, US, and Canadian deployments.
Every action is logged in the Unified Action Ledger and reviewable by change-advisory, internal audit, and second-line on demand. Identity-locked sensitive actions: low-risk auto-execute under guardrails, medium-risk soft-approve, high-risk hard-stop until a verified human confirms.
Yes — ServiceNow, Amdocs, NetCracker, Salesforce, Zendesk, Genesys, Five9, NICE, Verint, Calabrio, Microsoft Teams, Google Workspace, Slack, Jira, and dozens more via direct API and MCP integrations.
For legacy OSS, BSS, NMS, billing, and one-off admin systems without good APIs, lets agents operate them exactly the way your team does — clicking, typing, navigating menus. No integration build required for the long tail.
Every action is bound to a scoped permission with risk-tier guardrails. Low-risk actions auto-execute. Medium-risk actions soft-approve. High-risk actions hard-stop until a human confirms.
Every action is logged and reversible where reversal is technically possible. Mistakes are corrected, the correction feeds back into the platform's learning signal, and the same mistake doesn't repeat.
Pilots run with clear, customer-defined success criteria over 2 to 4 week evaluation periods. Pricing is usage-based — conversation minutes, model tokens, executed actions — with platform fees that scale with deployment size.
We don't share generic pricing decks because every operator's deployment is shaped by access technology, channels, business lines, and regulatory posture. Talk to us and we'll scope a pilot that proves the case before any commitment.
The vocabulary of the platform.
Proprietary concepts you’ll encounter across the Karmaflow platform — defined plainly, so network, IT service, support, and change-advisory teams reason from the same definitions.
- Living Intelligence Layer
- Karmaflow’s reasoning engine and native graph data store. Every agent reads from and writes to the same connected representation of accounts, conversations, product telemetry, and outcomes — so context compounds across interactions instead of resetting per session.
- Account Graph
- The connected representation of a customer, household, or institution inside the Living Intelligence Layer — primary and joint owners, beneficiaries, linked entities, transaction history, case history, disclosures served, and the relationships between them. Agents reason over the graph before acting.
- Cross-Encounter Memory
- Pattern recognition that operates across multiple conversations, channels, and time windows. Where a typical chatbot forgets after a session, Karmaflow agents recognise a signal raised on Tuesday in chat as related to a ticket filed in Q3 and a sales call from last quarter.
- Unified Action Ledger
- A reviewable audit trail for every agent decision and action. Each entry records what the agent did, the reasoning chain, the data it consulted, the permission scope it used, and the outcome. Compliance, security, and product teams read from the same ledger.
- Human Interface
- Karmaflow’s mechanism for operating software that does not expose a good API or MCP server. Agents drive the UI the way a human team would — clicking, typing, navigating menus — letting them work the long tail of internal admin tools, legacy dashboards, and one-off systems.
- Risk-Tier Guardrails
- Identity-locked, scoped permissions applied to every agent action. Low-risk actions auto-execute under monitoring. Medium-risk actions soft-approve with notification. High-risk actions hard-stop until a human confirms.
- Reasoning Trace
- The citation chain behind any agent output — the documents read, the graph nodes consulted, the prior tickets matched, and the decision path. Surfaced in-line for review and stored in the Unified Action Ledger.
- Autonomous AI Workforce
- Karmaflow’s framing for a configurable team of AI agents that operate revenue, customer success, support, and adjacent functions as one continuous reasoning system — not a collection of single-purpose bots.
Find the shape of your operation.
Telcos & ISPs
Tier-1 deflection, NOC triage, and outage comms — same standard, smaller queue.
Managed Service Providers
Multi-tenant client servicing with signed audit on every action.
Enterprise IT Service Teams
Service desk, access workflows, and incident triage reasoning.
Wholesale & Carrier Operators
Transport ticketing, partner provisioning, change-advisory automation.
Mobile Operators & MVNOs
Plan changes, port-out fraud triage, billing dispute handling.
IoT & Connectivity Providers
Device onboarding, SIM lifecycle, fleet-scale support reasoning.
A workforce that compounds. A team that elevates.
Operators running on Karmaflow run tier-1, NOC, and field operations as one continuous system. The work that runs on judgement and reasoning, scaled. The work that requires human wisdom, elevated. Every action, audit-trail-signed.
PHASE ONE LIVE IN UNDER A WEEK · DEEPER AGENTS IN 2–4 WEEKS
SIGNED AUDIT TRAIL · CPNI-ALIGNED · GDPR · CCPA
